©Copyright Legal Women Limited 2025

Sponsorship -  Email - Advertise

Legal Women Magazine, Benham Publishing Limited, Aintree Building, Aintree Way, Aintree Business Park Liverpool L9 5AQ

HOME      FOUNDER      INTERVIEWS      BLOGS      COMMUNITIES      EVENTS      RESOURCES      LW TEAM      SUBSCRIBE

Stalking: Legal Framework and Practical Challenges

By Nicola Smith-DWF, and Rowena Winsiewska; 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square


















Part 3 – The Three Paths to Protection: Understanding Stalking Protection Orders, Non-Molestation Orders and Restraining Orders.


When stalking is reported, several protective orders may be available to protect and safeguard a victim(s).

The correct route depends on the relationship between the parties, whether the police are involved, and whether any criminal proceedings have begun.  


The three key orders practitioners encounter are Stalking Protection Orders (SPOs), Non-Molestation Orders (NMOs) and Restraining Orders (ROs).


Each order offers a different framework for safeguarding victims and requires its own evidence, threshold and process.

1. Stalking Protection Orders (SPOs)

Brief summary:
A
civil order that may only be applied for by the police where stalking behaviour is suspected, including at an early stage before any charge. This order is used to impose both prohibitions (such as no contact, exclusion zones) and requirements (such as the surrender of devices). Breach of a SPO is a criminal offence attracting of imprisonment for up to 5 years.


What they are & when they are sought:
SPOs are designed for situations where someone has carried out acts associated with stalking and there is a
risk of further stalking. They are particularly valuable where the evidential picture is developing  but criminal proceedings are not yet appropriate or remain ongoing.


Evidence needed:
 The police must evidence:

Process:
The police apply to the magistrates’ court. Orders typically last for
at least two years and may include conditions restricting contact, movement, or access to devices and accounts. Breach is a standalone criminal offence.

2. Non-Molestation Orders (NMOs)

Brief summary:
A
family court order sought directly by the victim where there is a domestic or “associated” relationship (partners, ex-partners, family members, co-parents). Used to prevent harassment, intimidation, threats or contact. A NMO can be granted urgently without notice and a breach of a NMO is a criminal offence.

What they are & when they are sought:
NMOs are typically used when stalking or harassment occurs within a
domestic abuse context, including controlling, coercive or threatening behaviour. They are appropriate where the victim needs immediate protective conditions without relying on police action or criminal proceedings.


Evidence needed:


 Typical evidence includes:

Process:
Applications, which are made by the victim, are made via
Form FL401 with a supporting statement. The court may grant an ex parte order (without notice) where risk of harm is high. Orders often run for 6–12 months, with extensions available. Breach is a criminal offence.

3. Restraining Orders (ROs)

Brief summary:


A criminal court order imposed during or after criminal proceedings involving stalking, harassment or violence — and may be imposed even after an acquittal if protection is still necessary. A RO prevents contact or approach and can last for a fixed period or indefinitely if the situation is considered sufficiently high risk.


What they are & when they are sought:


ROs are available where the behaviour forms part of a criminal investigation or prosecution, and the court considers ongoing protection necessary. They are frequently used after a conviction but can also follow an acquittal where risk remains. A victim cannot apply directly for a RO but can ask the police or Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to apply for a RO from the court as part of the criminal case.


Evidence needed:


 Evidence comes from the criminal case itself, including:

Process:
The criminal court imposes the order at sentence or following acquittal. Conditions typically restrict contact or movement. Durations can be time-limited or
indefinite. Breach of a RO is a criminal offence.

Closing Summary

In stalking cases, choosing the correct protective order depends on where the case sits procedurally:



Each order has a distinct evidential threshold and application route, and a clear understanding of the differences helps ensure victims receive the right protection at the right time.


Nicola Smith
Associate-Police, Care and Justice Team

DWF

https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicsmith-lawyer


Rowena Wisniewska-Sethi

Barrister

4-5 Gray’s Inn Square

https://www.linkedin.com/in/rowena-wisniewska-b1713271/


February 2026